Central banks weigh risks

Central banks weigh risks
Central banks weigh risks
(c) unsplash
Share post:

Low productivity growth

Data on productivity growth in the USA showed an unfavorable picture. Hours worked, calculated from employment multiplied by average hours, rose strongly by 2.3% year-on-year. Because economic output rose by only 1.3% at the same time, productivity fell by a rounded one percentage point (negative productivity growth).

Compensation per hour worked increased by 4.8%, which is why unit labor costs, calculated as compensation minus productivity growth, rose by 5.8%. The development of unit labor costs is the most important determinant of inflation in the long run. Since 1960, unit labor costs have grown at an average annual rate of 2.9%, while the core rate of personal consumption expenditure inflation (core PCE deflator) has risen by 3.2%.

Firm labor market

Overall, the labor markets remain very firm, i.e. in disequilibrium. In the USA, the unemployment rate was very low at 3.4% in the month of April. The Congressional Budget Offict estimates that full employment without inflationary pressures is one percentage point higher. At the same time, the JOLTS report for the month of March continued to show a very high ratio of job openings to unemployed, but the trend is downward. A soft landing for the economy equates to a significant decline in job openings without a sharp increase in the unemployment rate.

Granted, so far the data are pointing in the right direction, but the risk of a sharp rise in the unemployment rate, synonymous with a recession, remains elevated. This is because the central bank is trying to reduce inflation with a restrictive monetary policy. The situation is similar in the euro zone. In March, the unemployment rate reached a new historic low of 6.5%. At the same time, the gross domestic product in the first quarter grew by only 0.1% quarter-on-quarter and 1.3% year-on-year. A soft landing in the euro zone is possible, but the restrictive monetary policy underscores the downside risks.

Note: Past performance is not a reliable indicator for future performance.

Positive growth momentum

The global Purchasing Managers’ Index for April rose for the fourth month in a row. With a value of 54.2, the index is well above the theoretical threshold of 50 that distinguishes expansion from contraction. Translated to real global GDP, the index implies growth of around 3% annualized (that is, annualized). In this context, the difference between the weak manufacturing sector and the strengthening in the services sector is widening. It is striking that in the manufacturing sector, new orders are shrinking slightly and employment is only slightly above the 50 mark. In contrast, in the services sector both indicators show an upward trend and are clearly in growth territory.

The development of selling prices also fits in with this: Falling but still slightly in the growth range in the manufacturing sector, rising and clearly in the growth range in the services sector. An important question regarding future development is whether this gap will be closed via a recovery in the manufacturing sector or a slowdown in the service sector. On the positive side, the report contradicts fears for an immediate recession. Unfortunately, this also dampens hopes for a rapid decline in inflation.

Pause in the rate hike cycle

Despite uncomfortably high inflation, more and more central banks are signaling a pause in the rate hike cycle to better assess the effects of previous rapid rate hikes. In the U.S., the Fed raised the key interest rate further by 0.25 percentage points. The upper band for the effective key interest rate is now at 5.25%. The forward guidance, according to which the Fed expects that further key rate hikes may be appropriate, was dropped. A slight bias for further hikes was maintained, but overall, statement and press conference signal a pause.

However, a pause does not mean the end in the rate hike cycle, as last week’s surprise rate hike by the Reserve Bank of Australia demonstrated. Moreover, high inflation does not justify key rate cuts for the second half of the year, which are reflected in market prices. The European Central Bank also raised its key interest rates by 0.25 percentage points. The interest rate on the deposit facility is now at 3.25%. The main point to highlight in the ECB’s statement is that the cumulative key rate hikes are transmitted forecully to the monetary and financial environment. Indeed, the latest ECB Bank Lending Survey showed a further tightening of lending standards and a further weakening of credit demand.

Note: Past performance is not a reliable indicator for future performance.

More time in achieving the inflation target

Central banks are signaling a somewhat less sharp (hawkish) stance because an effect of the rapid key rate hikes on the monetary and financial environment has already become visible. Monetary policy is expected to have a restrictive effect, but not to become much more restrictive, because this would (once again) increase the risks of recession. This is probably to avoid the classic monetary policy mistake that often the last key rate hikes were too much and unnecessarily triggered a recession.

Inflation is still uncomfortably high, but an overall tight environment could gradually lower inflation. So central banks seem to be taking more time to reach their 2% inflation target. This is even more true when one considers that inflation is a lagging indicator of economic activity. The stumbling block in this story is that central banks may once again misjudge underlying inflation as being lower than it actually is.

For a glossary of technical terms, please visit this link: Fund Glossary | Erste Asset Management

Legal note:

Prognoses are no reliable indicator for future performance.


Legal disclaimer

This document is an advertisement. Unless indicated otherwise, source: Erste Asset Management GmbH. Our languages of communication are German and English.

The prospectus for UCITS (including any amendments) is published in accordance with the provisions of the InvFG 2011 in the currently amended version. Information for Investors pursuant to § 21 AIFMG is prepared for the alternative investment funds (AIF) administered by Erste Asset Management GmbH pursuant to the provisions of the AIFMG in connection with the InvFG 2011. The fund prospectus, Information for Investors pursuant to § 21 AIFMG, and the Key Information Document can be viewed in their latest versions at the web site www.erste-am.com within the section mandatory publications or obtained in their latest versions free of charge from the domicile of the management company and the domicile of the custodian bank. The exact date of the most recent publication of the fund prospectus, the languages in which the Key Information Document is available, and any additional locations where the documents can be obtained can be viewed on the web site www.erste-am.com. A summary of investor rights is available in German and English on the website www.erste-am.com/investor-rights as well as at the domicile of the management company.

The management company can decide to revoke the arrangements it has made for the distribution of unit certificates abroad, taking into account the regulatory requirements.

Detailed information on the risks potentially associated with the investment can be found in the fund prospectus or Information for investors pursuant to § 21 AIFMG of the respective fund. If the fund currency is a currency other than the investor's home currency, changes in the corresponding exchange rate may have a positive or negative impact on the value of his investment and the amount of the costs incurred in the fund - converted into his home currency.

This document serves as additional information for our investors and is based on the knowledge of the staff responsible for preparing it at the time of preparation. Our analyses and conclusions are general in nature and do not take into account the individual needs of our investors in terms of earnings, taxation, and risk appetite. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of the future performance of a fund.

Leave a comment Required fields are marked with *

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *