IMF-meetings in Washington: positive outlook for emerging markets

IMF-meetings in Washington: positive outlook for emerging markets
IMF-meetings in Washington: positive outlook for emerging markets
Share post:


Guest Author: Felix Dornaus, Senior Fund Manager


The following points reflect my impressions at the presentations that I attended at the IMF-meetings in Washington from 12 to 15 October 2017.

Positive inflows into emerging market assets expected to continue in 2018

Total emerging markets-flows are still in the early stages of their comeback. 2017 saw a record USD 110bn in inflows. We expect the volume to exceed this number in 2018. US pension funds (as the biggest pool of funds in the USA) are still underweighted in the global emerging markets (GEM). The positive effects from the pressure created by the inflow are stronger than the negatives ones deriving from the G-3 central banks’ tightening mood. Within the asset class, market participants expect emerging markets equities to benefit the most (mainly Latin American equities and countries like Brazil and Argentina in particular).

Global emerging markets are still going through an improving macroeconomic trend. For example, average current account deficits have halved in the past four years.

In the presentations given, no major sell-off of commodities was expected. The estimated bandwidth of the oil price (WTI USD/bbl) for the coming years is USD 50 to 60.

What also supports emerging markets is the fact that many local central banks are still biased towards easing monetary measures. That is to say that further interest rate cuts can be expected for 2018.

Venezuela is expected to deliver on loan payments that will be falling due throughout the rest of this year, but the looming debt restructuring will be quite complicated and prolonged.

Risks for GEM investors are more related to the US

There is a paradigm shift in global relations. Emerging markets nowadays harbour fewer idiosyncratic risks. Key threats to global financial stability are more tied to the USA. For example, the carrot and stick approach pursued by Trump’s administration is really more of a stick and rather less of a carrot approach.

There is a wider use of sanctions (Russia, Venezuela, Iran, North Korea, maybe Chinese banks) and a greater bias towards protectionism (Nafta “renegotiation”, car imports, etc.).

On Nafta: the Trump administration has indicated its preference for leaving, but the final decision may be passed to Congress, which could be seen as a silver lining for compromise. A US withdrawal could cost Mexico 0.6% of GDP.

Optimism towards Europe – China is currently not the focus

The pessimism towards Europe over the past few years has turned into astonishing optimism. Brexit is seen as a non-systemic, localised UK problem. Also, the political momentum in Italy is not seen as a manifest systemic threat. 18 out of 19 countries are growing above potential.

China is not dominating the discussion about risk. That being said, perhaps a certain degree of risk that the country might not be able to maintain growth could be looming on the horizon; also, US sanctions against Chinese banks doing business with North Korea can possibly trigger capital outflows. Trump’s visit to China towards the end of the year may mitigate the latter risk.

Turkey is still a carry trade [1]. The higher risk profile is compensated by high interest rates. Frontier Markets (e. g. countries like Egypt, Sri Lanka, Ukraine or Kazakhstan) are attractive from a risk-return profile.


[1] A carry trade is a strategy in which an investor sells a certain currency with a relatively low interest rate (such as Euro or USD) and uses the funds to purchase a different currency yielding a higher interest rate (such as Turkish lira).


Legal note :

Prognoses are no reliable indicator for future performance.


Legal disclaimer

This document is an advertisement. Unless indicated otherwise, source: Erste Asset Management GmbH.Our languages of communication are German and English.

The prospectus for UCITS (including any amendments) is published in Amtsblatt zur Wiener Zeitung in accordance with the provisions of the InvFG 2011 in the currently amended version.Information for Investors pursuant to § 21 AIFMG is prepared for the alternative investment funds (AIF) administered by Erste Asset Management GmbH pursuant to the provisions of the AIFMG in connection with the InvFG 2011. The fund prospectus, Information for Investors pursuant to § 21 AIFMG, and the Key Information Document can be viewed in their latest versions at the web site within the section mandatory publications or obtained in their latest versions free of charge from the domicile of the management company and the domicile of the custodian bank. The exact date of the most recent publication of the fund prospectus, the languages in which the Key Information Document is available, and any additional locations where the documents can be obtained can be viewed on the web site A summary of investor rights is available in German and English on the website as well as at the domicile of the management company.

The management company can decide to revoke the arrangements it has made for the distribution of unit certificates abroad, taking into account the regulatory requirements.

Detailed information on the risks potentially associated with the investment can be found in the fund prospectus or Information for investors pursuant to § 21 AIFMG of the respective fund. If the fund currency is a currency other than the investor's home currency, changes in the corresponding exchange rate may have a positive or negative impact on the value of his investment and the amount of the costs incurred in the fund - converted into his home currency.

This document serves as additional information for our investors and is based on the knowledge of the staff responsible for preparing it at the time of preparation. Our analyses and conclusions are general in nature and do not take into account the individual needs of our investors in terms of earnings, taxation, and risk appetite. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of the future performance of a fund.