Turkey and the feeling of summer time sadness

Turkey and the feeling of summer time sadness
Turkey and the feeling of summer time sadness
Share post:

We are almost approaching the end of the summer but it looks like we are back to April 2015 in Turkey. The election outcome and aftermath did not work as politicians had desired and the efforts to form a government have failed so far.

June elections and its consequences

As a reminder: on 7 June 2015, Turkish parliamentary elections generated 40.9% votes for the Justice and Development (AKP), followed by the Republican People’s Party’s (CHP) with 25.0%, the Nationalistic Movement Party’s (MHP) with 16.3% and the People’s Democratic Party’s (HDP) with 13.1%. This indicated that AKP had lost its single party government and there will be four parties represented in the parliament. Turkey had two major options with this election outcome: a coalition government or early elections. Turkish politicians had a series of coalition meetings throughout the summer, but have failed to produce a coalition government, leaving the second option to be on the table. This is happening for the first time in Turkish politics, and it looks like we are back to April 2015. Very recently it is officially announced that Turkey will go for an early election on 1 November 2015. This means that we have a couple of uncertain months ahead. Reliable opinion polls will be followed closely once again. According to the current polls the increase in AKP support is only between 1 and 2.5%, which is not enough for AKP to form a single party government.

Turkey and terrorist attacks

Meanwhile, apart from politics, there were clashes between Turkish armed forces and PKK, where terrorist attacks killed more than 50 army and police officials in the last month. In late July, there was an emergency NATO meeting called by Turkey in which the NATO statement condemned terrorist attacks and expressed solidarity with Turkey. The country’s Southern region is in chaos due to Islamic State and Turkey was unable to form a government during this time period. Therefore; the terrorist attacks and Turkey’s response will continue to play a big role in the coming period as these attacks in turn affect political parties’ popular support. Meanwhile, Turkey and the US have completed an agreement for allowing Turkey to strike Islamic State targets in Iraq and Syria. However, they don’t expect the airstrikes to begin immediately.

How does this impact the economy?

The real impact of early elections on Turkish economy will be felt in the last quarter of 2015. In its last meeting the Central Bank of Turkey (CBT) did not change the rates. However, it hinted at a more tight fiscal policy – a rate hike. In their meeting with the economists, CBT underlined that they would wait for the FED decision, and they now (for the first time) consider local risks as possible. CBT also announced the roadmap aiming to simplify its monetary policy and decided further tightening TRY (Turkish New Lira) liquidity.
In addition, CBT expects a slight improvement in inflation. It highlighted that despite the correction in fruit and vegetable prices, rising red meat prices limited the decline in food inflation. The Bank also stated that it observes– albeit limited – improved inflation and core inflation indicators. Currently, the inflation forecast for the end of 2015 remains at 6.8%, while GDP is expected to grow by 3%. Depending on the political turmoil, there might be some downward revisions in the forecasts.


Despite the strong financial results for the first half of 2015, we see declining commodity prices and attractive valuation. The period of uncertainty before the elections is likely to impact investments and portfolio flows negatively during the coming months. We might see downgrades by rating agencies during this period. As politics continue to weigh on local markets, slowdown in the economy and as Fed gets ready to hike rates in late 2015; challenging months are ahead for us.



Legal disclaimer

This document is an advertisement. Unless indicated otherwise, source: Erste Asset Management GmbH.Our languages of communication are German and English.

The prospectus for UCITS (including any amendments) is published in Amtsblatt zur Wiener Zeitung in accordance with the provisions of the InvFG 2011 in the currently amended version.Information for Investors pursuant to § 21 AIFMG is prepared for the alternative investment funds (AIF) administered by Erste Asset Management GmbH pursuant to the provisions of the AIFMG in connection with the InvFG 2011. The fund prospectus, Information for Investors pursuant to § 21 AIFMG, and the Key Information Document can be viewed in their latest versions at the web site www.erste-am.com within the section mandatory publications or obtained in their latest versions free of charge from the domicile of the management company and the domicile of the custodian bank. The exact date of the most recent publication of the fund prospectus, the languages in which the Key Information Document is available, and any additional locations where the documents can be obtained can be viewed on the web site www.erste-am.com. A summary of investor rights is available in German and English on the website www.erste-am.com/investor-rights as well as at the domicile of the management company.

The management company can decide to revoke the arrangements it has made for the distribution of unit certificates abroad, taking into account the regulatory requirements.

Detailed information on the risks potentially associated with the investment can be found in the fund prospectus or Information for investors pursuant to § 21 AIFMG of the respective fund. If the fund currency is a currency other than the investor's home currency, changes in the corresponding exchange rate may have a positive or negative impact on the value of his investment and the amount of the costs incurred in the fund - converted into his home currency.

This document serves as additional information for our investors and is based on the knowledge of the staff responsible for preparing it at the time of preparation. Our analyses and conclusions are general in nature and do not take into account the individual needs of our investors in terms of earnings, taxation, and risk appetite. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of the future performance of a fund.