A Black Mink Event – COVID-20

A Black Mink Event – COVID-20
A Black Mink Event – COVID-20
(c) jo-anne-mcarthur-unsplash
Share post:

At the time of this writing, the world is looking in anticipation at Arizona where the lead of presidential candidate Joe Biden against incumbent Donald Trump narrows and the prospect of a contested election grows. Meanwhile 9000 kilometers away in Copenhagen, Danish prime minister Mette Frederiksen declared that all minks in the country will killed to control to curb the spread of a new SARS-CoV-2 variant.

The reason? The vaccines currently in development could be less effective at combating this new mutation. A Black Swan event is something that comes without warning and can have enormous effects on financial markets and society. Now we may be dealing with a Black Mink event. How did it come about?

Minks and the reservoir of viruses

Minks have long been known to be a potential reservoir of emerging viruses and the first cases of SARS-CoV-2 in minks have been detected in early summer 2020 leading to the cull of large mink populations in Spain and the Netherlands. Denmark, the world’s largest exporter of mink fur, has held back on announcing culls due to the relatively larger importance of the industry, which accounts for 0.7% of the country’s exports.

Mink fur is sought after in the Chinese apparel industry, while the fur is shunned in most Western countries. A so called “crossover” event has now pushed the Danish government into action. The cull will lead to the death of 17 million minks in roughly 1000 farms at the cost of more than EUR 700 million.

Aided by seabirds

Recently, SARS-CoV-2 has spread in Danish mink farm populations, potentially aided by seabirds carrying the virus in mink feces on their feet from farm to farm. The virus has mutated in the mink host and crossed back into the human population. Government officials estimate that roughly 5% of all active Covid cases in the Northern Jutland region (a sparsely populated region with a population size comparable to Carinthia) are caused by the mutated variant.

Some media outlets report that the variant has emerged as far away as Croatia, however, confirmation of this claim is difficult. The mutation in the variant concerns the spike protein on the outside of the virus. Unfortunately, this is exactly the part of the virus that allows most of the vaccines currently in development to be effective.

While the Danish Serum Institute found that antibodies from convalescent Covid patients are less effective at neutralizing the new variant with 4 mutations in the spike protein, there is no reason to believe that the cellular immunity granted by T and B cells will not be able to detect and destroy the new variant. However, the concern is that the new variant will spread and become the dominant variant while picking up further mutations on the spike protein (SARS-CoV-2 picks up one mutation in its 28,883 genes roughly every 16 days – slow compared to other viruses) to the point where even cellular immunity is ineffective.

A bouncer at a night club

To illustrate this rather complex problem, imagine a bouncer at a night club tasked to filter out troublemakers. From experience the bouncer (antibodies) knows that guests wearing red ties (spike protein) are trouble. All is well until the troublemakers decide to now wear green ties (mutated spike protein). The bouncer may see the green ties and suspect something is wrong, so he calls the head of security (B and T cells), who, after interviewing the guest in the green tie, determines that he is indeed a troublemaker.

The club stays safe, but head of security will have to check everyone with a green tie in the future. The troublemakers really want to get into the club and now decide to wear green socks (potential future spike protein mutation). In that case, the bouncer will not be suspicious and call the head of security. The troublemakers make it into the club and cause a fight (disease breaks out).

Conclusion

In summary, the events in Denmark have the potential to seriously prolong the ongoing pandemic, if the new variant is allowed to spread uncontrolled. If it became dominant and mutated further, new vaccines would have to be developed, which would be a tedious yet easier task than the first time around.

The Danish governments has apparently recognized the severity of the situation and has taken the necessary painful steps. Industrial farming of susceptible animals – mink farming still continues in the US, Canada and China – still poses a significant downside risk and will continue to be a hotbed for future pandemics.

Everything about the Coronavirus: https://blog.en.erste-am.com/dossier/coronavirus/ 

Legal note:
Prognoses are no reliable indicator for future performance.

DOSSIER

RESPOND TO THE ARTICLE

Leave a comment Required fields are marked with *

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Legal disclaimer

This document is an advertisement. Unless indicated otherwise, source: Erste Asset Management GmbH. Our languages of communication are German and English.

The prospectus for UCITS (including any amendments) is published in Amtsblatt zur Wiener Zeitung in accordance with the provisions of the InvFG 2011 in the currently amended version. Information for Investors pursuant to § 21 AIFMG is prepared for the alternative investment funds (AIF) administered by Erste Asset Management GmbH pursuant to the provisions of the AIFMG in connection with the InvFG 2011. The fund prospectus, Information for Investors pursuant to § 21 AIFMG, and the key investor document/KID can be viewed in their latest versions at the web site www.erste-am.com or obtained in their latest versions free of charge from the domicile of the management company and the domicile of the custodian bank. The exact date of the most recent publication of the fund prospectus, the languages in which the key investor document is available, and any additional locations where the documents can be obtained can be viewed on the web site www.erste-am.com.

This document serves as additional information for our investors and is based on the knowledge of the staff responsible for preparing it at the time of preparation. Our analyses and conclusions are general in nature and do not take into account the individual needs of our investors in terms of earnings, taxation, and risk appetite. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of the future performance of a fund.