What is helicopter money?

What is helicopter money?
What is helicopter money?
Share post:

mobile phones

Helicopter money: It’s not raining money – yet?

The monumental consequences of the coronavirus pandemic are threatening economic growth and the financial situation of businesses and private households across the entire globe.

In order to cushion these effects, governments have announced economic stimulus packages, and central banks have once again eased their monetary policy considerably in recent weeks.

However, while traditional monetary policy measures, such as interest rate cuts and bond purchases on the secondary market by central banks, are also employed, the focus has recently shifted to a concept that has always been the subject of debate: helicopter money.

What is helicopter money?

The economic theory of monetarism assumes that there is a connection between the amount of money available within an economic area and that area’s economic growth.

According to this model, the central bank is supposed to increase the supply of money when the economy is in a downturn and hardly reacts to interest rate changes.

To illustrate this principle, in 1969 the economist and Nobel Prize winner Milton Friedman used the image of a helicopter dropping money to stimulate consumption, which in turn should lead to a new balance in the economic system.

The closest real-world approximation to this image would be a variant in which, for example, the European Central Bank (ECB) directly transfers a monthly sum to every citizen in the currency area until inflation reaches the 2-per-cent target set by the Bank.

In contrast to conventional quantitative easing (QE), in which the money supply is controlled by buying and selling assets, helicopter money is newly created money that can no longer simply be withdrawn from the cycle.

A tax cut financed by the gradual purchase of government debt by the central bank would have the same effect. However, this version of helicopter money reveals a central point of criticism the measure faces.

Why it sounds good

Interest rates in the eurozone have recently already reached a record low and, in contrast to the US Federal Reserve, the ECB has had little margin for interest rate cuts. The eurozone’s ultra-loose monetary policy has not shown the desired effect in recent years: despite favourable conditions for loans, investment was limited and inflation was far too low to lend the economy any dynamism.

Consumption, on the other hand, continues to be a major support of the weak economic growth. The baseline is therefore equal to the scenario described by Milton Friedman, in which money from heaven could help.

The cons

Nevertheless, many questions remain unanswered for now. Firstly, there is a legal problem: In order to ensure the central bank’s independence, it is prohibited from directly financing national debt on a large scale – as Helicopter Money would do, for example, by way of a tax cut. Moreover, there is hardly any experience with an irreversible expansion of the money supply on this scale.

Finally, economists argue that, in the current situation, helicopter money would trigger hyperinflation and ignore the basic problem of the effects of the corona crisis, making demand the primary stimulus.

However, the impending economic slump was triggered by a supply shock, as supply chains have been disrupted and consumers have been kept from spending money by the measures to contain the pandemic, rather than by lack of money.

Supporters of helicopter money have placed their hopes in the large-scale evaluation of ECB policy ordered by the new monetary watchdog Christine Lagarde. In mid-March, however, Lagarde now announced that the review and any resulting changes would be postponed for at least six months, owing to the Corona crisis.

Our dossier on coronavirus with analyses: https://blog.en.erste-am.com/dossier/coronavirus/

Legal note:
Prognoses are no reliable indicator for future performance.









Legal disclaimer

This document is an advertisement. Unless indicated otherwise, source: Erste Asset Management GmbH. Our languages of communication are German and English.

The prospectus for UCITS (including any amendments) is published in accordance with the provisions of the InvFG 2011 in the currently amended version. Information for Investors pursuant to § 21 AIFMG is prepared for the alternative investment funds (AIF) administered by Erste Asset Management GmbH pursuant to the provisions of the AIFMG in connection with the InvFG 2011. The fund prospectus, Information for Investors pursuant to § 21 AIFMG, and the Key Information Document can be viewed in their latest versions at the web site www.erste-am.com within the section mandatory publications or obtained in their latest versions free of charge from the domicile of the management company and the domicile of the custodian bank. The exact date of the most recent publication of the fund prospectus, the languages in which the Key Information Document is available, and any additional locations where the documents can be obtained can be viewed on the web site www.erste-am.com. A summary of investor rights is available in German and English on the website www.erste-am.com/investor-rights as well as at the domicile of the management company.

The management company can decide to revoke the arrangements it has made for the distribution of unit certificates abroad, taking into account the regulatory requirements.

Detailed information on the risks potentially associated with the investment can be found in the fund prospectus or Information for investors pursuant to § 21 AIFMG of the respective fund. If the fund currency is a currency other than the investor's home currency, changes in the corresponding exchange rate may have a positive or negative impact on the value of his investment and the amount of the costs incurred in the fund - converted into his home currency.

This document serves as additional information for our investors and is based on the knowledge of the staff responsible for preparing it at the time of preparation. Our analyses and conclusions are general in nature and do not take into account the individual needs of our investors in terms of earnings, taxation, and risk appetite. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of the future performance of a fund.

Leave a comment Required fields are marked with *

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *