The US presidential election on 5 November comes with numerous socio-political aspects. At this point, we want to look only at the consequences for investors and the standing of the USA in the economic world today.
There are different ways to approach the question of what impact a Democratic or Republican presidential candidate has had or will have on equity market prices from 2025 onwards. If you take the helicopter perspective and look at the performance of US equities as a whole, i.e. without looking at individual economic sectors, for example, we find that only little stands out. The successful development, plotted here over 45 years, has been little affected by the political situation:
Please note: Past performance is no reliable indicator of future value development.
Performance of US shares 1980-2024
Looking at the national budget, on the other hand, we can see that a budget surplus has only been achieved once – around 1997-2002, mainly during the Bill Clinton years. Since then, the budget has shown a certain downward trend, intensified in the financial crisis of 2008/09 and the Covid crisis of 2020/21, when government support measures were necessary. The situation has gradually worsened to a current budget deficit of around 6.3%.
National budget USA 1980-2024
The development of the US dollar in comparison to other currencies, such as the euro, is also interesting. A strong currency is not exclusively, but to a large extent, an expression of a country’s strong competitive position. This means that a phase of strength in a currency is usually followed by a dip, as the exchange rates are trying to establish an equilibrium between the currency areas via export and import prices.
US dollar performance 1980-2024
Just a few years ago, forecasts suggested that China would surpass the US in terms of economic output within a foreseeable period of time. However, this is no longer the case today. Growth in China has slowed down on the back of decreased demographic momentum (the population pyramid has been shifting in favour of the older age groups). The real estate sector in particular, which was a humming growth engine for a long time, is now facing saturated demand. The movement from rural areas to the cities is already well advanced.
Comparative economic output (in 1,000 US-Dollar bn)
It is also interesting to look at the countries in Europe individually. Japan, Germany, and India are roughly comparable in terms of economic output, as are the UK and France, for example.
Comparative economic output (in 1,000 US-Dollar bn)
The question of what has made and continues to make the USA so successful can easily be answered by looking at the companies with the largest market capitalisation: technology. Microsoft, Apple, the computer chip manufacturer NVIDIA, Amazon, Meta, Alphabet,… are a manifestation of the fact that a massive part of the world’s economic output takes place online or in the form of electronic products, and is largely supplied by US companies. The use of artificial intelligence will only reinforce this.
The 20 largest listed companies USA (in 1,000 USD bn)
By contrast, the composition of the comparable European companies with the highest market capitalisation is somewhat different. Although the computer chip manufacturer ASML and the software company SAP are also among them, the proportion of traditional consumer goods manufacturers, some of them in the luxury segment, is higher. Novo Nordisk, a company that has been a leader in the pharmaceutical sector for a short time, is very successful in the development of therapies and active ingredients.
The 20 largest listed companies in Europe (in 1,000 USD bn)
Either way, US equities are now performing strongly again and have overcome the negative phase of 2022, when the fight against extreme inflation made it inevitable to raise lending rates and thus dampen the economy.
Please note: Past performance is no reliable indicator of future value development.
Performance of USA equities 2020-2024
One aspect from which the USA benefits greatly is its independence in the energy sector, i.e. oil and natural gas. Europe has been singing a very different, painful tune about this in recent years. The following chart shows OPEC’s crude oil production: it has been in decline since around 2018 and has recently been subject to further cutbacks. By contrast, the USA is producing record quantities of crude oil and can add more volume than OPEC is currently taking off the market, thereby stabilising prices on the global market.
Comparative crude oil production (in million barrels per day)
Are there any negative aspects among all of these? As mentioned at the beginning, this article ignores geopolitical and socio-political aspects, a plethora of which the presidential election certainly holds. The favourable stock market trend, on the other hand, could at best be interrupted by a recession. The reason for this would be that although the exceptionally rapid rise in lending rates had already dampened the economy, the full impact would not be felt until 2024 or 2025.
Forecasting recessions is notoriously difficult. One leading indicator is the “Sahm rule”, named after an employee of the US Federal Reserve. This rule measures the rise in unemployment. A sudden rise was previously a reliable indication of an impending recession. The chart shows that the indicator was already close to the threshold in October 2023, then developed favourably for a few months and rose again with the February 2024 value. It is therefore worth keeping an eye on the trend.
Leading recession indicator for the USA 2020-2024
Conclusion
The impact of this year’s US presidential election on the stock markets is likely to remain contained. Investors who invest broadly in equities on a global scale – for example with the CORE Equities fund – hold a US allocation of around two thirds in their fund and can benefit personally from the economic strength of the USA.
As an index-tracking fund, CORE Equities invests in a benchmark index. This index represents the performance of the 120 largest shares of companies from the USA, the Eurozone, the UK, Switzerland, and Japan. Sustainability criteria are also taken into account in the investment decision.
Please note: investing in securities involves risks as well as opportunities.
Notes CORE Equities
The discretionary selection of assets permitted for the investment fund is limited. The fund employs a passive investment policy and the scope of discretion of the management company is limited. The investment fund is a user within the meaning of Regulation (EU) 2016/1011 (Reference Assets Regulation). Please note that investing in securities also involves risks besides the opportunities described.
For further information on the sustainable focus of CORE Equities as well as on the disclosures in accordance with the Disclosure Regulation (Regulation (EU) 2019/2088) and the Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation (EU) 2020/852), please refer to the current Prospectus, section 12 and the Annex “Sustainability Principles”. In deciding to invest in CORE Equities, consideration should be given to any characteristics or objectives of the CORE Equities as described in the Fund Documents.