Trump’s withdrawal from the Paris climate accord

Trump’s withdrawal from the Paris climate accord
Trump’s withdrawal from the Paris climate accord
(c) iStock
Share post:

We have talked to the ESG analyst team of Erste AM about Trump’s withdrawal from the Paris climate accord in a roundtable discussion: Dominik Benedikt, Alexander Osojnik, Stefanie Schock, and Walter Hatak.

What does the withdrawal of the USA from the Paris climate accord mean for climate protection?  

Osojnik: The withdrawal of the USA is a setback for the global efforts to contain climate change. However, it is not the end of global engagement in this area. The European Union, China, and India have clearly declared themselves in favour of continuing the efforts. Expectations are for the announced withdrawal of the USA to lead to stepped-up cooperation by the remaining countries. Also, the withdrawal is not as certain as assumed. The USA can withdraw from the accord at the earliest on 4 November 2020, i.e. one day after the next presidential elections in the USA.

How likely is the accord to meet its CO2 targets without the contribution from the USA?

Schock: The faster action is taken, the easier it will be to achieve the Paris climate targets. Waiting longer today would mean deeper cuts later. Therefore, it would be a problem if the USA were to emit carbon dioxide ruthlessly for the coming four years. After all, the USA is responsible for about a fifth of global CO2 emission. In comparison, China and India together account for more than 44% of global emissions.

Benedikt: In contrast to Trump’s assumption that climate protection would only harm the US economy, technologies geared towards the future also offer opportunities. Other players have recognised the fact and are exploiting the status quo. For example, we expect to see even quicker progress in China and India when it comes to their attempts to take over the economic and political leadership in topics relating to future developments. This could make up for the withdrawal of the USA at least partially.

What stance do big companies take?

Benedikt: Trump’s decision is seen from a very critical perspective by the US industrial sector. Leading companies such as Apple, Facebook, Microsoft, and Peabody Energy, the biggest private cola mine operator in the world, have pointed out that the withdrawal from the Paris climate accord is a step in the wrong direction. In spite of record results from the combustion engine business, Ford sacked its CEO only a few days ago. His mistake was not to have a sufficiently wide array of strategies in future technologies in place such as e-mobility for example. Even Exxon Mobile, which denied climate change for a long time, was forced to make overcoming climate change one of its corporate goals by an overwhelming majority of its shareholders a few days ago.

Schock: The fight against climate change offers enormous economic chances. The US economy does not want to lose out on them. Trump wants to save about 70,000 jobs in the US coal industry. This can be related to the about 700,000 new jobs in future technologies such as renewable energies – in the USA alone. We expect the big US companies to continue investing in climate technologies, simply because it pays off. In addition, no internationally operating group can afford to bear the risk of uncontained climate change. Among them are for example volatile or disappearing water reserves.

Hatak: Interestingly, the Mar-A-Lago property of the Trump organisation is located at one of the coastal regions in Florida that would be the first to fall prey to the rising sea level. Maybe this could trigger a change of heart?

What role do other large countries and regions play in this topic?

Hatak: Only Syria and Nicaragua have not signed the Paris climate accord. It is surprising that Donald Trump is actually prepared to be in this camp of outsiders.

Osojnik: As addressed earlier, we expect regions and countries such as the EU , China, and India that want to continue contributing to the fight against climate change to step up their efforts. Here, we expect interesting developments, because even today China already invests more in renewable energies than in fossil energy carriers.

Benedikt:  Even in the USA, the resistance against Trump’s position has been on the rise: many big cities such as New York, Chicago, Los Angeles, and the city quoted by Trump, i.e. Pittsburgh, will continue their fight against climate change. California will not give up its role as pioneer in the climate and environmental area.

How can investors react to these developments?

Benedikt: Basically, the consequences of uncontrolled climate change could also benefit certain investors. For example, one could participate in the rebuilding of towns destroyed by catastrophes or drive the monopolisation of arable land and water. However, we regard such  “doomsday bets” as problematic both for ethical reasons and from the perspective of risk management. It is one of the principles of Erste AM for example not to engage in food speculation.

Schock: Sustainable investments in particular can help combat climate change: we invest in those companies that harbour the lowest degree of climate risks or that offer specific solutions. This way, we can reduce the CO2 intensity of our funds by about 60% of the most important global referential index. One example is our ERSTE WWF STOCK ENVIRONMENT fund: the producers of renewable energies in which the fund invests produced solar and wind power facilities in 2016 that during their useful life will be saving 580mn tonnes of carbon dioxide. This is equal to the combined emissions of France and Spain in 2013.




Leave a comment Required fields are marked with *

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Legal disclaimer

This document is an advertisement. Unless indicated otherwise, source: Erste Asset Management GmbH.Our languages of communication are German and English.

The prospectus for UCITS (including any amendments) is published in Amtsblatt zur Wiener Zeitung in accordance with the provisions of the InvFG 2011 in the currently amended version.Information for Investors pursuant to § 21 AIFMG is prepared for the alternative investment funds (AIF) administered by Erste Asset Management GmbH pursuant to the provisions of the AIFMG in connection with the InvFG 2011. The fund prospectus, Information for Investors pursuant to § 21 AIFMG, and the Key Information Document can be viewed in their latest versions at the web site within the section mandatory publications or obtained in their latest versions free of charge from the domicile of the management company and the domicile of the custodian bank. The exact date of the most recent publication of the fund prospectus, the languages in which the Key Information Document is available, and any additional locations where the documents can be obtained can be viewed on the web site A summary of investor rights is available in German and English on the website as well as at the domicile of the management company.

The management company can decide to revoke the arrangements it has made for the distribution of unit certificates abroad, taking into account the regulatory requirements.

Detailed information on the risks potentially associated with the investment can be found in the fund prospectus or Information for investors pursuant to § 21 AIFMG of the respective fund. If the fund currency is a currency other than the investor's home currency, changes in the corresponding exchange rate may have a positive or negative impact on the value of his investment and the amount of the costs incurred in the fund - converted into his home currency.

This document serves as additional information for our investors and is based on the knowledge of the staff responsible for preparing it at the time of preparation. Our analyses and conclusions are general in nature and do not take into account the individual needs of our investors in terms of earnings, taxation, and risk appetite. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of the future performance of a fund.