A tightrope walk between profit and responsibility

A tightrope walk between profit and responsibility
A tightrope walk between profit and responsibility
Share post:

Power comes from the socket. Hidden behind it, lies a reality that is a tightrope walk between supply and demand. An imbalance causes blackouts. Energy produced from renewable sources is particularly volatile. A solution for this problem are energy storage devices, especially batteries. The latter offer the advantage of being able to efficiently store power that has been produced locally (e.g. by solar cells). They also make power mobile and can replace petrol and diesel in our cars. In our interview, Dominik Benedikt, Senior ESG-Analyst Erste Asset Management, explains the effects of the rising demand for batteries with regard to environmental, social, and governance aspects.

Mr. Benedikt, the demand for energy storage devices is on the rise. What can you tell us about environmental and social criteria in the production process of batteries?

Dominik Benedikt, Senior ESG-Analyst Erste Asset Management

Benedikt: Basically, the rise in storage capacity has caused environmental risks to fall. The lithium ion batteries dominating today are non-toxic. That being said, while lithium is still relatively inexpensive, the rising production has enormous effects, which is particularly due to the high water consumption. Also, the production process requires graphite and cobalt. This causes social issues. Graphite is mainly produced in China under often dubious conditions, and cobalt from Congo is also a potential conflict material. Better control mechanisms in this context would be desirable. – Like in the IT sector for example, where they have been around for a while.

And how can environmental problems be reduced further?

Benedikt: The most obvious approach is recycling. Unfortunately, battery and device manufacturers continue to shift responsibility to the other party. The existing alliances between the car industry and specialised recycling companies could work as a blueprint, for example those between PSA and SNAM or between Tesla and Umicor. However, no recycling approach across the entire sector has been implemented yet due to a lack of economic viability. So far, only Aquion, the producer of saltwater batteries, seems to have reached a completely closed commodity cycle – as illustrated by a cradle-to-cradle certification. The so-called “second-life” solution is an alternative to recycling. Leclanché, a Swiss battery producer, designs its battery modules in such a way as to facilitate use in less demanding fields after their actual life. BMW is working on similar solutions: discarded car batteries are to be used for robots in factories. Also, the car manufacturer is developing stationary energy storage units from old vehicles in collaboration with Bosch. This approach could drastically cut the costs of electro mobility.

How can investors support this development, or indeed even benefit from it?

Benedikt: By relying on companies with a business model that hinges on strong future technology. Electrovaya for example is a small company that offers attractive growth potential on the back of innovative technology. The Canadian company produces lithium ion batteries, battery systems, and components for mobile and stationary energy storage and also has production facilities in Germany. What is special about the company is that it has managed to do away with the technically demanding and energy-intensive input of the popular yet toxic solvent NMP (N-methyl-pyrrolidone). This means that Electrovaya would not be affected by potentially more stringent regulations concerning the handling of toxic substances. In addition, in contrast to its competitors, the company uses so-called flexible ceramic separators, which currently represents the highest safety standard for lithium ion batteries and cells. All of this provides the company with a strong position in the market.

For more information, have a look at our latest ESG-Magazine: esgletter.de.erste-am.com



Legal disclaimer

This document is an advertisement. Unless indicated otherwise, source: Erste Asset Management GmbH. Our languages of communication are German and English.

The prospectus for UCITS (including any amendments) is published in accordance with the provisions of the InvFG 2011 in the currently amended version. Information for Investors pursuant to § 21 AIFMG is prepared for the alternative investment funds (AIF) administered by Erste Asset Management GmbH pursuant to the provisions of the AIFMG in connection with the InvFG 2011. The fund prospectus, Information for Investors pursuant to § 21 AIFMG, and the Key Information Document can be viewed in their latest versions at the web site www.erste-am.com within the section mandatory publications or obtained in their latest versions free of charge from the domicile of the management company and the domicile of the custodian bank. The exact date of the most recent publication of the fund prospectus, the languages in which the Key Information Document is available, and any additional locations where the documents can be obtained can be viewed on the web site www.erste-am.com. A summary of investor rights is available in German and English on the website www.erste-am.com/investor-rights as well as at the domicile of the management company.

The management company can decide to revoke the arrangements it has made for the distribution of unit certificates abroad, taking into account the regulatory requirements.

Detailed information on the risks potentially associated with the investment can be found in the fund prospectus or Information for investors pursuant to § 21 AIFMG of the respective fund. If the fund currency is a currency other than the investor's home currency, changes in the corresponding exchange rate may have a positive or negative impact on the value of his investment and the amount of the costs incurred in the fund - converted into his home currency.

This document serves as additional information for our investors and is based on the knowledge of the staff responsible for preparing it at the time of preparation. Our analyses and conclusions are general in nature and do not take into account the individual needs of our investors in terms of earnings, taxation, and risk appetite. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of the future performance of a fund.

Leave a comment Required fields are marked with *

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *