Was the decision by the UK to leave the EU a non-event? Globally speaking, share prices have increased, the spreads for default risk have narrowed on many markets, and the UK central bank, i.e. the Bank of England, did not cut its key-lending rate.
Good growth rate
The economic indicators continue to suggest real economic growth of 2 to 2.5% globally. While, from a historic perspective, the growth rate is below average, in view of the disadvantageous developments such as falling productivity growth, an ageing population, weak world trade, and the pressure to deleverage, this bandwidth can actually be regarded as good.
Positive data surprises
The preliminary global purchasing managers indices for the service sector decreased in July, but the one for the manufacturing sector increased. Also, the data surprises are remarkably positive in most developed economies. This means that the actual growth rates of indicators such as retail sales, industrial production, and employment have exceeded estimates. The economic indicators in China suggest that the stimulus measures have been sufficient to facilitate the stabilisation of economic growth at 6.5%. While the economic growth rate in the Eurozone weakened from 2.4% in Q1 to 1.2%, it was still above potential growth (i.e. long-term expected average). The low yet still existing credit growth of about 2% y/y indicates the stabilisation of growth towards its potential. At a growth rate of +1.2% in Q2, the US economy failed to recover significantly from the subdued growth rate in Q1 (0.8%). The solid growth of private consumption in combination with the early drawing-down of inventories suggests a slightly higher growth rate for Q3. The limited investment activity admittedly remains a weak spot.
Brexit effects regionally limited
The immediate economic effects are regionally limited. In the UK, some survey indicators incurred a drastic fall in July. This suggests a significant decline of real economic growth of 2.4% in Q2 to zero growth in the current, third quarter. But even in the UK, not all indicators are heading South. In July, the Lloyds Bank Business Barometer bounced back from a drastic slump in June and is now only slightly below the long-term average. In the EU, worries that the sentiment in the EU might deteriorate, have not materialised. In fact, the July values for business confidence in the EU have largely increased.
End of austerity
The Brexit vote is part of the surging global anti-establishment movement. Basically, this is about isolation vs. openness. In the EU, this means an increase in centrifugal forces. With regard to EU politics, this shifts the balance from moral hazard concerns to measures taken in support of the economy. The European Commission has already announced not to fine Portugal or Spain, although their budget deficits are excessive. Almost the same is true for fiscal policy in general. The closer monetary policy gets to the frontier of its effectiveness, the more likely austerity policies will come to an end.
Defaulted loans in Italy
At the moment investors are looking at the high volume of defaulted loans and the low capital ratio in Italy. Public subsidies are only permitted when, prior to them being effected, the public sector also shoulders a part of the losses. While this sounds reasonable, one has to bear in mind that the Italian bank bonds are not only held by institutional investors such as pension funds and insurance companies, but also by “small” (retail) investors. The likelihood of a pragmatic solution has increased.
Monetary policy still effective
The effectiveness of the monetary policy has decreased, but it still exists. In reaction to the increased uncertainty in the wake of the Brexit vote, many important central banks have sent out signals that they would loosen their monetary strategy if need be. As a result, the future money market rates priced into the bonds decreased. This means that the markets were supported by a mere statement, not by an actual measure. So the central banks still have some powder, which has not been wasted prematurely.
Rate cut in the UK
The Bank of England has fuelled expectations about an actual loosening for the next monetary policy committee meeting on 4 August. At the very least, a rate cut from the current 0.5% is priced in as we speak.
Step towards helicopter money in Japan
On 29 July the Japanese central bank pointed to a, what it called, significant level of uncertainty with regard to the development of inflation. Until the next meeting of the monetary committee in September, the status quo is to be comprehensively assessed. Indeed, the rate of inflation in Japan is moving farther away from the inflation target of 2% as we speak. In June inflation (excluding food and energy, i.e. the core inflation rate) amounted to only 0.4% y/y. The probability of a further loosening with regard to quality and quantity of the bond purchases has increased. At the same time, a fiscal package will be announced shortly in Japan. This would basically mean another step towards helicopter money (i.e. the central bank permanently finances the budget deficit).
Fed in wait-and-see mode
The US Fed has assumed a wait-and-see stance and thus supported the markets. But on 27 July officials declared that the short-term risks for the economic outlook had decreased. The tendency towards, or prospect of, a rate hike this year remains in place. This step is currently priced in.
Elevated political risks
The political and geopolitical risk remains elevated: the increasing tensions in the South China Sea
Summary and conclusion:
- The leading indicators suggest continued real global growth of 2 to 2.5%.
- The central banks have reacted to the elevated uncertainty triggered by the Brexit by assuming a wait-and-see stance and issuing expansive signals.
- The financial markets have digested the increased uncertainty well.
- This combination is (still) positive for risk assets in the short run, especially with regard to default risk (company, government, emerging markets).
- Investors should not become careless with regard to risk. To mention but two: commodity prices, especially oil, have been falling since the beginning of July, and the expectations of rate hikes in the USA might rise.
This document is an advertisement. All data is sourced from ERSTE-SPARINVEST Kapitalanlagegesellschaft m.b.H., Erste Asset Management GmbH and ERSTE Immobilien Kapitalanlagegesellschaft m.b.H. unless indicated otherwise. Our languages of communication are German and English.
The prospectus for UCITS (including any amendments) is published in Amtsblatt zur Wiener Zeitung in accordance with the provisions of the InvFG 2011 in the currently amended version. Information for Investors pursuant to § 21 AIFMG is prepared for the alternative investment funds (AIF) administered by ERSTE-SPARINVEST Kapitalanlagegesellschaft m.b.H., Erste Asset Management GmbH and for ERSTE Immobilien Kapitalanlagegesellschaft m.b.H. pursuant to the provisions of the AIFMG in connection with the InvFG 2011 and regarding ERSTE Immobilien Kapitalanlagegesellschaft m.b.H. published in Amtsblatt zur Wiener Zeitung or at the web site www.erste-am.com or www.ersteimmobilien.at .
The fund prospectus, Information for Investors pursuant to § 21 AIFMG and the key investor document/KID can be viewed in their latest versions at the web site www.erste-am.com or www.ersteimmobilien.at or obtained in their latest versions free of charge from the domicile of the management company and the domicile of the custodian bank. The exact date of the most recent publication of the fund prospectus, the languages in which the key investor document/KID is available, and any additional locations where the documents can be obtained can be viewed on the web site www.erste-am.com or www.ersteimmobilien.at .
This document serves as additional information for our investors and is based on the knowledge of the staff responsible for preparing it at the time of preparation. Our analyses and conclusions are general in nature and do not take into account the individual needs of our investors in terms of earnings, taxation and risk appetite. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of the future performance of a fund.